Archive

Posts Tagged ‘UST’

Housing and asset prices generally

February 1st, 2010

The SIGTARP has apparently gone and illustrated the ways in which is government is propping up home prices in the US.

As an investor, why would I buy something when I know the prices are being artificially inflated?

Further, why is the government using tax dollars to attempt to force me to overpay for a home?

As a renter, shouldn’t I be entitled to the same tax rebate as a home buyer? Is it not effectively a tax on all renters in the US?

Unfortunately, I guess stupid, overlevered property owners are a larger voting block than rational thrifty renters…

UST , ,

Game Changer

January 16th, 2009

The US government has announced it’s latest bailout package… just in time for the long weekend before the inauguration. Expect the stock markets to be up today… probably 100+ points on the Dow and 15 on the S&P. Treasuries were trading down in Europe and continue to do so in the pre-market.

Up until today, we had an odd situation. No matter how much junk the Treasury hoovered up from the banks, Treasuries continued to trade up. I think the cat is now out of the bag. The problem is that the Fed is going to do everything it can to support low yields across the curve.

All this nonsense avoids the fundamental issue. They’re playing hot potato with all the toxic assets, but at the end of the day, someone has to eat them.

So the big question – why should I the taxpayer eat the losses instead of Bob Rubin the shareholder of Citi or Kenneth Lewis of Bank of America? The obvious answer is I shouldn’t.

The crooks at the banks have resorted to using the Federal taxing authority to paper over their losses. We should start a class-action RICO suit against the banks and the federal government collectively. What a sham.

Uncategorized ,

How does Quantitative Easing work?

January 13th, 2009

The functional execution of QE has me a little concerned. As the yield on Treasuries drops, the incentive to hold them or buy more also drops. When the yield is at zero, the incentive is debatable. The flip side of the coin is that the lower the rates required by the purchasers, the better the deal that the Treasury is getting on the money.

Am I crazy or is there a feedback loop at play here, whereby the government is incentivized to let the system begin to crumble if only to be able to finance its way out of the hole it’s in? Sounds like something Soros would key in to. Theory of Reflexivity or something…

I raise the question only because there’s a lot of talk lately of central banks, especially the Chinese, not wanting to own more Treasuries.

If your minions are starting to believe they don’t need you any more, how do you put them back in line? You undermine their confidence of course.

Quantitative Easing ,

Is it or isn’t it?

January 8th, 2009

This article from the International Herald Tribune suggests in the headline that the Chinese appetite for US Debt is decreasing. The funny thing is that when you actually read the article, there’s not a lot of meat backing up the suggestion. New data is coming soon, but what I vaguely hinted at last week will likely be the case.

Rather imprecise data for Chinese consumption of US Debt

From the article:

Normally, China would be the most avid taker of the debt required to pay for those deficits, mainly short-term Treasury securities. In the past five years, China has spent as much as one-seventh of its entire economic output on the purchase of foreign debt – largely U.S. Treasury bonds and American mortgage-backed securities.

But now, Beijing is seeking to pay for its own $600 billion economic stimulus – just as tax revenue falls sharply as the Chinese economy slows.

What the article doesn’t say, but what is clearly the elephant in the room, is that without access to cheap credit for the US, China’s export boom will die. So while they may look to spend $600B internally, the Chinese still have roughly a roughly $30B monthly trade surplus (down from $50B) and almost $2 Trillion in reserves that will have to find a home somewhere. If China tries to dump its US reserves it’ll cause itself collateral damage as the dollar collapses.

However, what seems clear to me is that the Chinese have effectively pulled out of the agency market in the US as well as the equity market and have focused their entire purchasing power on Treasuries. That’s why we have negative real yields on the short end of the curve (and probably on the long end as well eventually.)

Pay attention because here comes the coup de grace.

Going back to my Friday night thought, it’s the Chinese that have allowed the US Treasury to cheaply act as the CDS counter-party of last resort and, in fact, provided the capital to refinance all this toxic garbage at insanely low rates.

The catch? They sucked every last dollar/yuan out of every other capital market in the United States.

Why? Because they were holding all the toxic MBS debt and they wanted fresh Benjamins (aka Treasuries) instead of the monopoly money (aka agency debt which is “like treasuries but with a better yield”) the US had been pushing on them since 2001.

In one fell swoop, the Chinese forced the US to provide them with CDS protection on their entire portfolio of agency debt and MBS. That’s why every other investor in the US just lost their shirt. The Chinese called up and told the Treasury that it had to act as a collection agency for all the bad debt it had sold. So the Treasury turned around and confiscated as much capital as it could and pretended to save the American middle class when it was simply saving China.

To what end? To prevent a currency melt-down and the immediate impoverishment of the US.

China , ,

Thought for Friday night

January 2nd, 2009

Here’s what I’ve been pondering. The US Treasury has essentially just stepped in as the counterparty of last resort in the CDS market. AIG would have started a systemic cascade failure if they defaulted on their CDS commitments. So the government stepped in.

The irony is that even as the UST was hoovering up all this garbage, the market has rewarded them with all-time lows in financing costs. Just when the Treasury was toxifying its balance sheet, the market was rewarding it.

Odd. Where’d all the money come from? A question for another day…

UST ,